A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry

Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz and Yusoff, Sumiani (2015) A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45. pp. 244-248. ISSN 1364-0321, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.043.

PDF (A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry)
A_review_of_life_cycle_assessment_method_for_building_industry.pdf - Other

Download (900kB)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.043


A recent study suggested that buildings globally consume up to 40 of energy and responsible for half of world greenhouse gas emission. Introducing life cycle assessment (LCA) to the building industry is important because it can measure every environmental impact involved in every process from cradle to grave systematically. Within the last decade, research on LCA has increased covering from construction process to manufacturing of building materials. The methods to assess buildings are diverse as buildings have different functions, materials, sizes and locations. The aim of this article is to review the LCA methods and to distinguish phases and materials that affect significantly to environment. The findings show the methods are based on ISO 14040 series with variance to suit different scopes, aims and limitations. The operational phase is identified to consume the highest energy and concrete responsible for the highest embodied energy. The findings also suggested that building material with lower embodied energy does not necessarily have lower life cycle energy. Therefore, implementation of LCA can determine and mitigate the environmental impacts in the development stage thus promoting sustainability in building industry. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ISI Document Delivery No.: CE6QQ Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 44 Cited References: Adalberth K, 1997, BUILD ENVIRON, V32, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(96)00069-8 Anonymous, 2005, E38405 ASTM, P1 Arena AP, 2003, BUILD ENVIRON, V38, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00056-2 Asif M, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P1391, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.023 Attia S, 2011, STATE ART EXISTING E Bare JC, 2000, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V5, P319, DOI 10.1007/BF02978665 Blengini GA, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P869, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.009 Blengini GA, 2010, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V15, P652, DOI 10.1007/s11367-010-0190-5 Bribian IZ, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P2510, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001 Buchan RD, 2003, ESTIMATING BUILDERS Cole RJ, 1996, BUILD ENVIRON, V31, P307, DOI 10.1016/0360-1323(96)00017-0 Cole RJ, 1999, BUILD ENVIRON, V34, P335 Ding GKC, 2007, BUILD RES INF, V35, P487, DOI 10.1080/09613210601116408 Fava J, 2009, J IND ECOL, V13, P491, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00150.x Fay R, 2000, BUILD RES INF, V28, P31 Goedkoop M, 2010, INTRO TO LCA Guinee JB., 2002, HDB LIFE CYCLE ASSES, P692 Han G, 2011, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN Huijbregts MAJ, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P2600, DOI 10.1021/es020971+ ISO, 2006, 140402006 ISO, V2006 ISO, 2006, 14044 ISO, V2006 Iyer-Raniga U, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V47, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.001 Khasreen Mohamad Monkiz, 2009, Sustainability, V1, DOI 10.3390/su1030674 Kofoworola OF, 2009, ENERG BUILDINGS, V41, P1076, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.06.002 Lopez-Mesa B, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P699, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.017 Mithraratne N, 2004, BUILD ENVIRON, V39, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.008 Monahan J, 2011, ENERG BUILDINGS, V43, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.09.005 Ochsendorf J, 2011, METHODS IMPACTS OPPO Ortiz O, 2009, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V23, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012 Ortiz-Rodriguez O, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P2435, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.021 Ove Arup and Partners Hong Kong Ltd, 2007, INTR LIF CYCL EN ASS Peuportier BLP, 2001, ENERG BUILDINGS, V33, P443, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00101-8 Rebitzer G, 2004, ENVIRON INT, V30, P701, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005 Rossi B, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V51, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.017 Sartori I, 2007, ENERG BUILDINGS, V39, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001 Scheuer C, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P1049, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00066-5 Singh A, 2010, J MONETARY ECON, V57, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.05.012 Suh S, 2007, INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS, V12, P351, DOI 10.1065/lca2007.08.358 Thiers S, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V51, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.018 Thormark C, 2002, BUILD ENVIRON, V37, P429, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00033-6 Utama A, 2008, ENERG BUILDINGS, V40, P1911, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.04.017 Utama A, 2009, ENERG BUILDINGS, V41, P1263, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.025 Van Ooteghem K, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V49, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.028 Wu JG, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V46, P610, DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9497-z Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz Yusoff, Sumiani 0 PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD OXFORD RENEW SUST ENERG REV
Uncontrolled Keywords: Life cycle assessment, Building industry, Energy, Sustainability, RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, ENERGY ASSESSMENT, LCA, CONSTRUCTION, HOUSES, PERFORMANCE, DWELLINGS, FRAMEWORK,
Subjects: T Technology > T Technology (General)
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering
Depositing User: Mr Jenal S
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2015 00:37
Last Modified: 08 Nov 2019 08:22
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/13755

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item