Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction

Ali, S. and Abu Osman, Noor Azuan and Eshraghi, A. and Gholizadeh, H. and Abd Razak, N.A.B. and Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar (2013) Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction. Clinical Biomechanics, 28 (9-10). pp. 994-999. ISSN 02680033, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.09.004.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Interface pressure in transtibial socket during ascent and descent on stairs and its effect on patient satisfaction)
Interface_pressure_in_transtibial_socket_during_ascent_and_descent_on_stairs_and_its_effect_on_patient_satisfaction.pdf - Other

Download (119kB)
Official URL: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0...

Abstract

Background Transtibial amputees encounter stairs and steps during their daily activities. The excessive pressure between residual limb/socket may reduce the walking capability of transtibial prosthetic users during ascent and descent on stairs. The purposes of the research were to evaluate the interface pressure between Dermo (shuttle lock) and Seal-In X5 (prosthetic valve) interface systems during stair ascent and descent, and to determine their satisfaction effects on users. Methods Ten amputees with unilateral transtibial amputation participated in the study. Interface pressure was recorded with F-socket transducer (9811E) during stair ascent and descent at self-selected speed. Each participant filled in a questionnaire about satisfaction and problems encountered with the use of the two interface systems. Findings The resultant mean peak pressure (kPa) was significantly lower for the Dermo interface system compared to that of the Seal-In X5 interface system at the anterior, posterior and medial regions during stair ascent (63.14 vs. 80.14, 63.14 vs. 90.44, 49.21 vs. 66.04, respectively) and descent (67.11 vs. 80.41, 64.12 vs. 88.24, 47.33 vs. 65.11, respectively). Significant statistical difference existed between the two interface systems in terms of satisfaction and problems encountered (P < 0.05). Interpretation The Dermo interface system caused less pressure within the prosthetic socket compared to the Seal-In X5 interface system during stair negotiation. The qualitative survey also showed that the prosthesis users experienced fewer problems and increased satisfaction with the Dermo interface system.

Item Type: Article
Funders: UNSPECIFIED
Additional Information: Ali, Sadeeq Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Gholizadeh, Hossein Abd Razak, Nasrul Anwar Bin Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Bin eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England Bristol, Avon 2013/10/29 06:00 Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Nov-Dec;28(9-10):994-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Amputee, Pressure, Prosthetic interface systems, Satisfaction, Transtibial prosthesis, Interface system, Patient satisfaction, Qualitative surveys, Statistical differences, Trans-tibial prosthesis, Transtibial amputees, Haptic interfaces, Interactive computer systems, Stairs, Surveys, Artificial limbs, cellophane, adult, aged, article, climbing, clinical article, female, human, interface pressure, leg amputation, lower leg prosthesis, male, pain, priority journal, questionnaire, walking.
Subjects: T Technology > T Technology (General)
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering
Depositing User: Mr Jenal S
Date Deposited: 10 Mar 2014 06:40
Last Modified: 07 Feb 2019 07:53
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/9517

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item