Evaluation of postural steadiness in below-knee amputees when wearing different prosthetic feet during various sensory conditions using the biodex (R) stability system

Arifin, N. and Abu Osman, Noor Azuan and Ali, S. and Gholizadeh, H. and Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar (2015) Evaluation of postural steadiness in below-knee amputees when wearing different prosthetic feet during various sensory conditions using the biodex (R) stability system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 229 (7). pp. 491-498. ISSN 0954-4119

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)
Official URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019139

Abstract

In recent years, computerized posturography has become an essential tool in quantitative assessment of postural steadiness in the clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to explore the ability of the Biodex((R)) Stability System (BSS) to quantify postural steadiness in below-knee amputees. A convenience sample of 10 below-knee amputees participated in the study. The overall (OSI), anterior-posterior (APSI) and medial-lateral (MLSI) stability indexes as well as the percentage of time spent in left and right quadrants and four concentric zones were measured under altered sensory conditions while standing with solid ankle cushion heel (SACH), single-axis (SA) and energy storage and release (ESAR) feet. Significant difference was found between sensory conditions in SACH and ESAR feet for OSI (SACH, p=0.002; ESAR, p=0.005), APSI (SACH, p=0.036; ESAR, p=0.003) and MLSI (SACH, p=0.008; ESAR, p=0.05) stability indexes. The percentage of time spent in Zone A (0 degrees-5 degrees) was significantly greater than the other three concentric zones (p<0.01). The loading time percentage on their intact limb (80-94) was significantly longer than the amputated limb (20-6) in all conditions for all three prosthetic feet. Below-knee amputees showed compromised postural steadiness when visual, proprioceptive or vestibular sensory input was altered. The findings highlight that the characteristics of postural stability in amputees can be clinically assessed by utilizing the outcomes produced by the BSS.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ISI Document Delivery No.: CL9LI Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 37 Cited References: Arnold BL, 1998, J ATHL TRAINING, V33, P323 Aydog E, 2006, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V25, P462, DOI 10.1007/s10067-005-0074-4 Barnett CT, 2012, GAIT POSTURE, V37, P319 Blackburn JT, 2000, J SPORT REHABIL, V9, P315 Blumentritt S, 1999, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V23, P231 Borg FG, 2010, J NEUROENG REHABIL, V7, DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-7-38 Buckley JG, 2002, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V81, P13, DOI 10.1097/00002060-200201000-00004 BURKE MJ, 1978, ANN RHEUM DIS, V37, P252, DOI 10.1136/ard.37.3.252 Cachupe W., 2001, MEAS PHYS ED EXERC S, V5, P97, DOI 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0502₃ CLARK LA, 1981, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V5, P11 Cohen J., 1998, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA Devlin M, 2004, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V85, P1339, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.025 ENGLISH RD, 1995, J REHABIL RES DEV, V32, P32 Gailey R, 2008, J REHABIL RES DEV, V45, P15, DOI 10.1682/JRRD.2006.11.0147 Gear W, 2011, INT J EXERC SCI, V5, pS13 Geurts Alexander C. H., 1992, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, V8, P145, DOI 10.3109/09593989209108094 GOH JCH, 1984, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V8, P147 Hafner BJ, 2005, J PROSTHET ORTHOT, V17, P5, DOI DOI 10.1097/00008526-200510001-00004 Hinman MR, 2000, J SPORT REHABIL, V9, P240 Horak FB, 2006, AGE AGEING, V35, P7, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afl077 HORAK FB, 1986, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V55, P1369 HU MH, 1994, J GERONTOL, V49, pM52 ISAKOV E, 1992, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V73, P174 Kozakova D., 2009, ACTA U PALACKIANAE O, V39, P51 Mayer A, 2011, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-118 Mcllroy WE, 1995, CLIN BIOMECH, V12, P66 Melzer I, 2004, AGE AGEING, V33, P602, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afh218 Miller WC, 2001, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V82, P1238, DOI 10.1053/apmr.2001.25079 Nadollek Heidi, 2002, Physiother Res Int, V7, P203, DOI 10.1002/pri.260 PRIETO TE, 1993, IEEE T REHABIL ENG, V1, P26, DOI 10.1109/86.242405 Salsabili H, 2011, J REHABIL RES DEV, V48, P775, DOI 10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0160 Shumway-Cook A, 2000, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V55, pM10 Testerman C, 1999, FOOT ANKLE INT, V20, P317 Vanicek N, 2009, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V90, P1018, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.024 WINTER DA, 1990, MED PROG TECHNOL, V16, P31 Wong CK, 2013, PHYS THER, V93, P1520, DOI 10.2522/ptj.20130009 Yim-Chiplis P K, 2000, Biol Res Nurs, V1, P321, DOI 10.1177/109980040000100408 Arifin, Nooranida Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Ali, Sadeeq Gholizadeh, Hossein Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Wan Engineering, Faculty /I-7935-2015 Engineering, Faculty /0000-0002-4848-7052 University of Malaya/Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia UM/MOHE/HIR D000014-16001 This study was funded by the University of Malaya/Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia UM/MOHE/HIR (grant no. D000014-16001). 0 SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD LONDON P I MECH ENG H
Uncontrolled Keywords: Amputees, Biodex Stability System, postural balance, prosthesis, rehabilitation, LOWER-LIMB AMPUTEES, STANDING BALANCE, AMPUTATION, RELIABILITY, ADAPTATION, NONFALLERS, FALLERS, PEOPLE, ADULTS, SCALE,
Subjects: T Technology > T Technology (General)
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering
Depositing User: Mr Jenal S
Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2016 00:51
Last Modified: 25 Oct 2018 08:44
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/15725

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item