Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis

Romanos, G.E. and Toh, C.G. and Siar, C.H. and Swaminathan, D. and Ong, A.H. (2002) Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 17 (1). pp. 44-51. ISSN 0882-2786,

[img]
Preview
 PDF
Histologic_and_histomorphometric_evaluation_of_peri-implant_bone_subjected_to_immediate_loading_An_experimental_study_with_Macaca_fascicularis.pdf
Download (28kB)

Abstract

Purpose: Immediately loaded splinted implants can become osseointegrated when they are placed in the anterior part of the mandible. The concept of immediate loading has not been well examined in the posterior mandible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hard tissue reactions around immediately loaded implants placed in the posterior mandible in the monkey model. Materials and Methods: Six adult M. fascicularis monkeys were used in this study. Thirty-six Ankylos implants (Degussa Dental, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany) were placed after extraction of the second premolar, first, and second molar teeth and complete healing of the sockets. Control (C) group implants were placed and, after osseointegration, were loaded for 1 month using temporary acrylic resin prostheses and later for 2 months using splinted metal crowns. In the contralateral region of the mandible, test (T) group implants were placed and loaded immediately with the same sequence as carried out for the C implants. After sacrifice of the animals, specimens were examined histologically and evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: All implants were osseointegrated. Compact, cortical bone In contact with the implant surface without any gaps or connective tissue formation was demonstrated. Discussion: Histomorphometric findings of the bone-implant-contacts showed no significant differences between the T and C group implants. Peri-implant mineralized bone areas presented statistically significant differences and showed a higher density of bone between the threads of immediately loaded implants (P < .05). Conclusions: Immediately loaded splinted implants in the posterior mandible can become osseointegrated with a hard tissue peri-implant response similar to that of delayed loaded implants. Moreover, immediate loading seems to increase the ossification of the alveolar bone around endosseous implants.

Item Type: Article
Funders: UNSPECIFIED
Additional Information: ISI Document Delivery No.: 521DY Times Cited: 59 Cited Reference Count: 57 Cited References: Abrahamsson I, 1996, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V7, P212, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070303.x Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11 ALBREKTSSON T, 1981, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V52, P155, DOI 10.3109/17453678108991776 BABBUSH CA, 1986, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V44, P274, DOI 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90078-9 Balshi T J, 1997, Implant Dent, V6, P83, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199700620-00002 BRANEMARK PI, 1983, J PROSTHET DENT, V50, P399, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2 BRUNSKI J B, 1992, Clinical Materials, V10, P153, DOI 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y Buser D, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P405 BUSER D, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P165 Buser D A, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P173 Carr AB, 1996, J PROSTHET DENT, V76, P500, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90008-6 Chiapasco M, 1997, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V8, P48, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00007.x DEPORTER DA, 1986, J DENT RES, V65, P1064, DOI 10.1177/00220345860650080501 DONATH K, 1982, J ORAL PATHOL MED, V11, P318, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x Ericsson I, 2000, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V11, P26, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x Ericsson I, 1996, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V7, P20, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070103.x Gotfredsen K, 1991, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V2, P30, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020104.x Branemark P I, 1977, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, V16, P1 HANSSON HA, 1983, J PROSTHET DENT, V50, P108, DOI 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90175-0 Horiuchi K, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P824 Hutton J E, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P33 JAFFIN RA, 1991, J PERIODONTOL, V62, P2, DOI 10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2 JAWORSKI ZFG, 1980, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V62, P104 JEMT T, 1993, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V4, P187, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040404.x Johansson CB, 1991, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V2, P24, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020103.x KIRSCH A, 1984, FORTSCHR ZAHNARZTL I, V1, P35 LANYON LE, 1984, J BIOMECH, V17, P897, DOI 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90003-4 Ledermann P, 1979, Dtsch Zahnarztl Z, V34, P907 Ledermann PD, 1983, SCHWEIZ MONATSSCHR Z, V93, P1070 Lekholm U, 1985, TISSUE INTEGRATED PR, P199 Levy D, 1996, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V7, P101, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070203.x Lozada J L, 2000, J Oral Implantol, V26, P51, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0051:SRFTSA>2.3.CO;2 Lum L B, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P456 Nentwig GH, 1993, IMPLANTOLOGIE, V3, P225 Piattelli A, 1998, J PERIODONTOL, V69, P321 Piattelli A, 1993, J Oral Implantol, V19, P314 Piattelli A, 1997, J PERIODONTOL, V68, P591 PILLIAR RM, 1991, J BIOMED MATER RES, V25, P467, DOI 10.1002/jbm.820250405 Randow K, 1999, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V10, P8, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100102.x ROBERTS WE, 1984, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V86, P95, DOI 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4 RUBIN CT, 1987, J ORTHOPAED RES, V5, P300, DOI 10.1002/jor.1100050217 Saadoun A P, 1992, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V12, P486 SAGARA M, 1993, J PROSTHET DENT, V69, P281, DOI 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90107-Y Salama H, 1995, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V15, P344 SALAMA H, 1996, INT J ORAL MAXILLOF, V11, P125 SCHNITMAN P A, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P96 Schnitman PA, 1997, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V12, P495 SMITH JM, 1983, BONE HISTOMORPHOMETR, P285 Soballe K, 1993, Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, V255, P1 SOBALLE K, 1992, J ORTHOPAED RES, V10, P285, DOI 10.1002/jor.1100100216 Spiekermann H, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P231 Szmukler-Moncler S, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V43, P192, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K SZMUKLERMONCLER S, 1996, BIOL MECH TOOTH MOVE, P611 Tarnow DP, 1997, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V12, P319 THOMAS KA, 1985, J BIOMED MATER RES, V19, P145, DOI 10.1002/jbm.820190205 THOMAS KA, 1987, J BIOMED MATER RES, V21, P1395, DOI 10.1002/jbm.820211205 Wohrle PS, 1992, J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V18, P382 Romanos, GE Toh, CG Siar, CH Swaminathan, D Ong, AH Quintessence publ co inc Carol stream
Uncontrolled Keywords: Bone immediate loading implant monkey posterior mandible dental implants titanium implants soft-tissues interface dogs prostheses
Subjects: R Medicine > RK Dentistry
Divisions: Faculty of Dentistry > Dept of Oral Pathology & Oral Medicine & Periodontology
Depositing User: Ms Nursyafiqah Abd Malek
Date Deposited: 10 Jan 2013 00:16
Last Modified: 10 Jan 2013 00:16
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/4314

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
UM Research Repository is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.