A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles

Imazu, H. and Uchiyama, Y. and Kakutani, H. and Ikeda, Kei-Ichi and Sumiyama, K. and Kaise, M. and Omar, S. and Ang, T.L. and Tajiri, H. (2009) A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2009. pp. 1-6. ISSN 1687-6121, DOI https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/546390.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Full Text)
SalemO_(2009).pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/546390

Abstract

Background and Aims. There are limited data on the differences in diagnostic yield between 25-gauge and 22-gauge EUS-FNA needles. This prospective study compared the difference in diagnostic yield between a 22-gauge and a 25-gauge needle when performing EUS-FNA. Methods. Forty-three patients with intraluminal or extraluminal mass lesions and/or lymphadenopathy were enrolled prospectively. EUS-FNA was performed for each mass lesion using both 25- and 22-gauge needles. The differences in accuracy rate, scoring of needle visibility, ease of puncture and quantity of obtained specimen were evaluated. Results. The overall accuracy of 22- and 25-gauge needle was similar at 81% and 76% respectively (N.S). Likewise the visibility scores of both needles were also similar. Overall the quantity of specimen obtained higher with the 22-gauge needle (score: 1.64 vs.

Item Type: Article
Funders: UNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywords: Prospective Comparison; EUS-Guided FNA; 25-Gauge Needles; 22-Gauge Needles
Subjects: R Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine
Depositing User: Ms. Juhaida Abd Rahim
Date Deposited: 07 Jul 2017 04:13
Last Modified: 07 Jul 2017 04:13
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/17459

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item