Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of antibiotics and calcium hydroxide against enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentine

Chai, W.L. and Hamimah, H. and Abdullah, M. (2013) Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of antibiotics and calcium hydroxide against enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentine. Sains Malaysiana, 42 (1). pp. 73-80. ISSN 0126-6039

[img]
Preview
PDF
evaluation_of_antimicrobial_efficacy_of_antibiotics.pdf

Download (1MB)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of erythromycin, oxytetracycline and calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)(2) against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in dentine. E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (American type culture collection) was inoculated into standard tooth sections and incubated in aerobic atmosphere at 37 degrees C for 21 days. The infected tooth sections were then exposed to the test agents for 5 and 10 min. The colony forming units (CFU) after the exposure periods at three different depths <100 mu m, 100-350 pm and 350-500 mu m were enumerated. After 5 min of exposure, both antibiotics had significantly lower CFU count than Ca(OH)(2) solution at three dentinal depths. Comparing with the oxytetracycline, the CFU count of the erythromycin was significantly (p<0.05) lower at the depth of 100-500 pm. Similarly, after 10 min of exposure, erythromycin had significantly lower CFU count (p<0.05) at three dentinal depths. Oxytetracycline showed significantly lower CFU count than Ca(OH)(2) at 100 pm depth. Comparing with the two exposure times, the erythromycin and Ca(OH)(2) groups showed significant lower CFU counts after 10 min of exposure in the antimicrobial agents to 5 min. In conclusion, both antibiotics show better antimicrobial activity than Ca(OH)(2) in removing the E. faecalis biofilm in dentine.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ISI Document Delivery No.: 085NV Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 39 Cited References: Abdullah M, 2005, J ENDODONT, V31, P30, DOI 10.1097/01.don.0000136205.80807.5a Almyroudi A, 2002, J ENDODONT, V28, P163, DOI 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00005 Baca P, 2011, J ENDODONT, V37, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.036 Chai Wen L, 2007, J Oral Sci, V49, P161, DOI 10.2334/josnusd.49.161 COSTERTON JW, 1994, J BACTERIOL, V176, P2137 Dahlen G, 2000, ORAL MICROBIOL IMMUN, V15, P309, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-302x.2000.150507.x Distel JW, 2002, J ENDODONT, V28, P689, DOI 10.1097/00004770-200210000-00003 Evans M, 2002, INT ENDOD J, V35, P221, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00504.x George S, 2005, J ENDODONT, V31, P867, DOI 10.1097/01.don.0000164855.98346.fc Giardino L, 2006, J ENDODONT, V32, P1091, DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.008 Gilad JZ, 1999, J ENDODONT, V25, P722, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80117-4 Gomes BPFA, 2003, INT ENDOD J, V36, P267, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00634.x Gorduysus M, 2011, AUST ENDOD J, V37, P128, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00239.x Grundling GL, 2011, J ENDODONT, V37, P1128, DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.006 Haapasalo HK, 2000, INT ENDOD J, V33, P126, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00291.x HAAPASALO M, 1987, J DENT RES, V66, P1375, DOI 10.1177/00220345870660081801 Hoshino E, 1996, INT ENDOD J, V29, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01173.x Kishen A, 2006, J BIOMED MATER RES A, V77A, P406, DOI 10.1002/jbm.a.30622 Lima KC, 2001, J ENDODONT, V27, P616, DOI 10.1097/00004770-200110000-00004 Lin S, 2003, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V96, P751, DOI 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00355-X Love RM, 2001, INT ENDOD J, V34, P399, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00437.x Mehrvarzfar Payman, 2011, J Oral Sci, V53, P355 Mohammadi Zahed, 2009, J Calif Dent Assoc, V37, P98 Molander A, 1998, INT ENDOD J, V31, P1, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.t01-1-00111.x MOLANDER A, 1990, INT ENDOD J, V23, P113, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1990.tb00849.x Molander A, 2003, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V96, P744, DOI 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00361-5 Neglia R, 2008, NEW MICROBIOL, V31, P57 NERWICH A, 1993, J ENDODONT, V19, P302, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80461-9 ORSTAVIK D, 1990, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V6, P142 Saber Sel D, 2012, EUROPEAN J DENT, V6, P43 SAFAVI KE, 1990, J ENDODONT, V16, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81670-5 Sahar-Helft S, 2011, PHOTOMED LASER SURG, V29, P753, DOI 10.1089/pho.2010.2981 Sandoe JAT, 2006, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V57, P767, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkl013 Neto MM, 2012, INT ENDOD J, V45, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01994.x Sen BH, 1999, J ENDODONT, V25, P235, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80149-6 Siqueira JF, 1996, J ENDODONT, V22, P674, DOI 10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80062-8 Sundqvist G, 1998, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V85, P86, DOI 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90404-8 Tong ZC, 2011, J ENDODONT, V37, P1116, DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.020 Torabinejad M, 2003, J ENDODONT, V29, P170, DOI 10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002 Chai, W. L. Hamimah, H. Abdullah, M. University of Malaya, Malaysia Vote F0376/2004B This research was supported by the University of Malaya, Malaysia, (Vote F0376/2004B). We would like to thank Mr. Soo Choon Cheng for his technical advice and support. Univ kebangsaan malaysia Selangor
Uncontrolled Keywords: Antimicrobials biofilm calcium hydroxide dentinal tubules Enterococcus faecalis in-vitro root dentin apical periodontitis sodium-hypochlorite disinfection tubules chlorhexidine clindamycin medications bacteria
Subjects: R Medicine > RK Dentistry
Divisions: Faculty of Dentistry > Dept of General Dental Practice And Oral & Maxillofacial Imaging
Depositing User: Mr Ahmad Azwan Azman
Date Deposited: 16 Jul 2013 00:25
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2019 09:02
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/7739

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year