Yamada, Minoru and Lee, Wei-Ju and Akishita, Masahiro and Yang, Ming and Kang, Lin and Kim, Sunyoung and Lim, Jun-Pei and Lim, Wee-Shiong and Merchant, Reshma A. and Ong, Terence and Peng, Li-Ning and Phannarus, Harisd and Tay, Laura and Woo, Jean and Chen, Liang-Kung and Arai, Hidenori (2023) Clinical practice for sarcopenia in Asia: Online survey by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 115. ISSN 0167-4943, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2023.105132.
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to specialIntscript investigate the clinical practice for the management of sarcopenia among healthcare professionals in Asia, specialIntscript determine the characteristics of clinical care provided by geriatricians versus by other healthcare professionals , specialIntscript clarify the awareness of sarcopenia. Methods: From December 1 to 31, 2022, an online survey was completed by 1990 healthcare professionals in Asia. The survey comprises demographics , institutional characteristics, basic sarcopenia-related details, and sarcopenia-related assessment and treatment details. Results: The mean respondent age was 44.2 +/- 10.7 years, 36.4% of the respondents were women, and the mean years of experience in clinical practice were 19.0 +/- 10.6 years. The percentages of respondents who were aware of the term ``sarcopenia'', its definition and the importance of its management were high, at 99.3%, 91.9%, and 97.2%, respectively. The percentages of respondents who had screened patients for, diagnosed patients with, and treated patients for sarcopenia were 42.4%, 42.9% , 58.8%, respectively. Medical doctors had higher per-formance rates compared to allied health professionals (45.5% vs. 40.5% for screening, 56.8% vs. 34.5% for diagnosis, , 65.0% vs. 55.0% for treatment) (P < 0.001). Especially, among medical doctors, geriatricians had significantly higher rates compared to non-geriatricians (64.3% vs. 34.1% for screening; 76.7% vs. 44.8% for diagnosis; 82.7% vs. 54.4% for treatment, respectively) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Although the importance of the concept and management of sarcopenia is well recognized, there is a gap in its detection and management in clinical practice between medical doctors and allied health professionals, and also between geriatricians and non-geriatricians. Many geriatricians collaborate with other healthcare professionals to appropriately manage sarcopenia. In the future, educating all medical staff on the proper management of sarcopenia is necessary.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Funders: | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [Grant no. 21H02834] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Sarcopenia; Clinical practice; Healthcare professionals; Geriatrician; The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia |
| Subjects: | R Medicine |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Medicine Department |
| Depositing User: | Ms. Juhaida Abd Rahim |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2025 04:29 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2025 04:29 |
| URI: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/48579 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
