The effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year post-operative data from randomized controlled trials

Memon, Muhammed Ashraf and Osland, Emma and Yunus, Rossita Mohamad and Hoque, Zahirul and Alam, Khorshed and Khan, Shahjahan (2024) The effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year post-operative data from randomized controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 38 (11). pp. 6254-6269. ISSN 0930-2794, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11303-x.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11303-x

Abstract

BackgroundTo evaluate 5-year effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) solely based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of 5-year postoperative GERD data comparing LVSG and LRYGB in adults were undertaken. Electronic databases were searched from January 2015 to March 2024 for publications meeting inclusion criteria. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was applied to estimate pooled odds ratio where meta-analysis was possible. Bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and GRADE.ResultsFive RCTs were analysed (LVSG n = 554, LRYGB n = 539). LVSG was associated with increased adverse GERD outcomes compared to LRYGB at 5 years. The odds for revisional surgery to treat GERD in LVSG patients were 11 times higher compared to LRYGB (OR 11.47, 95% CI 1.83 to 71.69; p = 0.02; I2 = 0% High level of certainty). Similarly pharmacological management for increasing GERD was significantly more frequent in LVSG patients compared to LRYGB (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.31 to 6.55; p <= 0.01; I2 = 0% Moderate level of certainty). Overall, LVSG was associated with significantly more interventions (both medical and surgical) for either worsening GERD and/or development of de novo GERD compared to LRYGB (OR 5.98, 95% CI 3.48 to 10.29; p <= 0.01; I2 = 0%) Moderate level of certainty).ConclusionsThe development and worsening of GERD symptoms are frequently associated with LVSG compared to LRYGB at 5 years postoperatively requiring either initiation or increase of pharmacotherapy or failing that revisional bariatric surgery. Appropriate patient/surgical selection is crucial to reduce these postoperative risks of GERD.

Item Type: Article
Funders: CAUL
Uncontrolled Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Laparoscopic; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy; Meta-analysis; Systematic review
Subjects: R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Depositing User: Ms. Juhaida Abd Rahim
Date Deposited: 17 Feb 2025 01:55
Last Modified: 17 Feb 2025 01:55
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/47426

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item