Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China

Zeng, Li and Chua, Eng Guan and Xiong, Ying and Ding, Shihua and Ai, Hui and Hou, Zhibo and Loke, Mun Fai and Goh, Khean Lee and Tay, Chin Y. and Marshall, Barry J. and Zhu, Fuqiang and Sun, Dayong (2020) Actual and estimated adenoma detection rates: a 2‐year monocentric colonoscopic screening outcome in Shenzhen, China. JGH Open, 4 (4). pp. 707-712. ISSN 2397-9070, DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12322.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12322

Abstract

Background and Aim: While adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality metric for screening colonoscopy, it remains difficult to be accessed due to the lack of integrated endoscopy and pathology databases. Hence, the use of an adenoma-to-polyp detection rate quotient and polyp detection rate (PDR) has been proposed to predict ADR. This study aimed to examine the usefulness of estimated ADR across different colonic segments in two age groups for Shenzhen people in China. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 7329 colonoscopy procedures performed by 12 endoscopists between January 2012 and February 2014. The PDR, actual ADR, and estimated ADR of the entire, proximal, and distal colon, and within each colonic segment, in two patient age groups: <50 and ≥50 years, were calculated for each endoscopist. Results: The overall polyp and adenoma prevalence rates were 19.1 and 9.3%, respectively. The average age of adenoma-positive patients was significantly higher than that of adenoma-negative patients (54 ± 12.6 years vs 42.9 ± 13.2 years, respectively). A total of 1739 polyps were removed, among which 826 were adenomas. More adenomatous polyps were found in the proximal colon (60.4%, 341/565) than in the distal colon (40.9%, 472/1154). Overall, both actual and estimated ADR correlated strongly at the entire colon level and within most colonic segments, except for the cecum and rectum. In both age groups, these parameters correlated strongly within the traverse colon and descending colon. Conclusion: Caution should be exercised when predicting ADR within the sigmoid colon and rectum. © 2020 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Funders: Health and Family Planning Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (grant number 201601021), Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (grant number SZSM201510050)
Uncontrolled Keywords: adenoma detection rate; colon; colonoscopy; polyp detection rate
Subjects: R Medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine
Depositing User: Ms. Juhaida Abd Rahim
Date Deposited: 20 Jan 2021 06:57
Last Modified: 20 Jan 2021 06:57
URI: http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/25704

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item